PSN-L Email List Message
Subject: Re: from Angel in Panama
From: "a.rodriguez" stuff@.................
Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 07:02:23 -0500
Thank you for you convincing e-mail. I have done a bit more work and
even gone so far as to re-read the TAC32 documentation. I think I see
what the main display is telling me. I also got out the
scope and found the PPS signal at the right places and now think I
understand things a bit better.
In the end I will have to caulk up some of my confusion to WinOncore.
While in the MotBin mode a selftest with WinOncore reported nothing
was working. Still does.
I am back no to TAC32 with a 1pps and again feel that it is all the
accuracy that I need.
Saturday, May 3, 2003, 8:44:23 PM, you wrote:
k> NTP offsets of 100's of milliseconds are not unusual. It depends on how far
k> away the server is.
The server wherever it is is far away, believe me, sometimes I think live at the ends
of the earth. Can't even get a resistor sometimes.
k> Can you tell me more about how you have Tardis
Tardis is just set up to get the time from the Naval server and set
the pc's clock, nothing fancy. I have several station that do not have
GPS's and need to continue to use Tardis and NPT. I now can see that
I may have to figure out how to make some corrections to the station.
Seislog, the data capture software I use, will allow me to give the
station a time correction. I just need to figure out what I want that
correction to be. While I was comparing the TAC32/GPS to TARDIS/NPT
the difference was quite stable and consistent at -.0820 seconds.
k> Just telling it to set the time every second may not do what
k> you want. Most NTP client software tries to keep the PC clock within a
k> second of UTC.
k> GPS by itself can deliver time well below a microsecond without any trouble,
k> better if you have a good receiver. I used to work for TrueTime (now a
k> division of Symmetricom) and we and our competitors claim accuracy in the
k> area of 25 nanoseconds RMS, 100 ns peak. Many of them use Motorola OnCore
k> receivers to get there.
k> The real trick is getting the time from the receiver to the PC. If you just
k> use the serial message, all of the precision from the GPS has gone out the
Yes, I came to that realization a while back. GPS without 1pps is
worse than NTP.
k> Some people use the 1 Pulse Per Second (PPS) output from the
k> receiver into one of the RS-232 control lines on the PC serial port to
k> improve the timing. Then they dig deep into the PC to use the interrupts
k> for the best response. Even then, you can't get the PC's clock set closer
k> than a few milliseconds. The people who wrote TAC32 claim 25 milliseconds,
k> which is pretty reasonable.
k> Based on your setup, I would question Tardis and NTP before TAC32 and GPS.
k> At these levels, you can ignore cable delay from the antenna. Even 300
k> meters of cable will only shift the time about a microsecond or so.
Thanks for for getting me back on track.
Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
[ Top ]
[ Back ]
[ Home Page ]