PSN-L Email List Message
Subject: Re: Modified sound card and datalogging and geophones
From: Gordon Couger gcouger@..........
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 16:43:51 -0500
Out of sequence and possible not on subject but it has some
thoughts on timing that are important. I must have come in the
middle and don't understand your set up. I thought you were
recording data to disk with a computer sound card.
I am working on a sismomenter that records several sismometers
at one time in the 0-50 HZ rang on the two channels of a sound
card for imaging shallow aquifers looking for larger gravel to
find better water well in a shallow aquifer along Red River
between Oklahoma and Texas so I can afford to put in irrigation.
I have probably imposed my project on yours without realizing it.
A GPS will give you the best time stamp you could ask for some
even have a 100 kHz clock as well a 1 second pulse that are
linked to GPS clocks. They can be used to phase lock frequency
sources to for super accurate osilators.
If you are not interested in 1 to 20 Hz signals sound cards are
pretty good tools. If you are really serious about low
frequencies and accurate timing Windows poses a lot of problems.
First Windows is an event driven operating system and there is
no assurance when a program will run. The sound card gets around
that but you have to put a chirp on the signal to synchronize it
with time you can depend on the computer clock or the RS232 port.
Having worked with embedded systems for the last 20 years I
would choose a real time computer. There are real time versions
of Linux but I think that's over kill for dataloging geophones.
A GPS for a time base, a good a/d converter and fast
microcontroler would be the way I would do it. I am working with
a very fast board 60 MHz with 4 10 bit A/D channels
> In a message dated 18/07/2005 19:31:08 GMT Daylight Time,
> mike8s2@......... writes:
> installed some larger-capacitance-value coupling capacitors on my
> 24-bit sound card so I could resolve lower frequencies. What is a
> good datalogging app to
> use with this?
> Hi Greg,
> I suggest that you look at Larry's website at
> http://psn.quake.net/ and read some of the articles. Look at other
> websites on http://psn.quake.net/dave/map.htm
> A soundcard by itself has a frequency range of about 10 Hz to 24 KHz
> and it is basically an AC only device. The 10 Hz lower frequency is
> limited by the input C + R circuit. The standard PC drivers set the
> sample rate from 8,000 to 48,000 sps. Using this, you end up with simply
> massive files on a daily basis and no quick way of monitoring them. I
> haven't seen an application which enables you to use the soundcard ADC
> at really low sample rates, say 20 / sec and return them to a file.
> Assuming that you are in the States, you can buy a $25 10 bit ADC
> from Dataq, but it is usual to use 12 to 16 bit ADCs. Following on a
> geophone, you will need a low noise amplifier and a filter. See
> http://users.viawest.net/~aloomis/seismom.htm or
> It is usual to limit amateur seismic sensors to frequencies of less
> than 10 Hz. This cuts out most of the urban traffic and environmental
> noise, which is of no interest to most of us and may swamp everything
> else above 20 Hz.
> You also need a timing system which is good to better than 1 sec.
> Unfortunately, most computers are fitted with something called a
> 'software clock', which can vary by minutes per day. The first seismic P
> waves travel at maybe 10 km / sec, so a 1 minute error would give a
> location error of ~380 miles. This really is useless for seismic work
> and why you need a dedicated data recording program which takes this
> into account.
> The P and S waves are of most interest to us, since they enable you
> to determine the distance of the quake from your station. Long distance
> P waves are at about 1 Hz and S waves are at about 0.5 Hz, but nearby
> quakes have higher frequency components.
> The 'cheap' 4.5 Hz geophones can be extended down to about 0.5 Hz
> with a special amplifier, but they will also pick up local and near
> regional quakes on their own.
> It is also possible to make a really cheap vibration detector /
> seismometer using piezo disks and added weights. I use one from about
> 0.25 Hz to 10 Hz, but I need a FET input opamp and good screened cable
> to do this.
> *Do 'read up' about earthquakes and seismometers before you start.
> There is a lot to learn!*
> To go beyond this very basic advice, I would need to know where you
> are located, your knowledge of electronics, what tools / constructional
> skills you have and how much you are prepared to spend. I am not being
> inquisitive, merely practical. Commercial seismometer systems may cost
> several 10's of thousands of $, but amateur systems may be made from a
> few $100 upwards. You can exchange construction time + skills for ready
> made equipment, but the effort may be considerable. The real art lies in
> not making too many mistakes.....
> I hope that this hslps...
> Chris Chapman
Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
[ Top ]
[ Back ]
[ Home Page ]