PSN-L Email List Message
Subject: Re: Caution on low pass filtering emphasis
From: George Bush ke6pxp@.......
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:46:22 -0800
Thanks for this reminder. I try to not filter, as a general rule and
only resort to it when I can't see the signal without filtering.
At 12:45 PM 12/30/2009, you wrote:
>I sometimes think that we amateur seismologist over-emphasize the
>need for low pass filtering, with the unexpected result that we
>destroy the fidelity of the earthquake signal. To illustrate what
>we might be losing, I posted my recording of this mornings Baja
>quake using both raw data and HIGH PASS filtered data in the
>WinQuake volume format. The high pass was done using WinQuake
>filters set at 1 Hz, two pole.
>Here is a link to the posting:
>The trace on the bottom is the raw data.
>As you can see, the quake was about 1677 km from this station but
>there was still lots of high frequency (> 1 Hz) in the data. If
>filtered low pass below 1 Hz, this information would be compromised,
>and as you can see, there is a lot of information to be lost.
>Something to think about,
>Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
>To leave this list email PSN-L-REQUEST@.............. with the body
>of the message (first line only): unsubscribe
>See http://www.seismicnet.com/maillist.html for more information.
Sea Ranch, CA, USA
Public Seismic Network Mailing List (PSN-L)
[ Top ]
[ Back ]
[ Home Page ]